DWI Dismissal Could Lead To Removal Of Ignition Interlock Device

Proving that the Wichita Falls Times Record News Online is just a little behind what most people would consider news, a few days ago they ran a story titled “First Offense May Require DWI Device”:

Repeat drinking and driving offenders in Texas know the hassle that comes with the advanced charges, but soon, first-time offenders, too, could face a tougher crack down.

Texas state legislation mandates that repeat offenders be ordered to have an ignition interlock installed on their vehicle as a condition of their bond.

However, that could change soon, as legislators are looking at amending the law, making the interlock a requirement on the first offense.

Actually, the legislative session is over, and I’m pretty sure House Bill 1110, which would have done just that, was left pending in committee, which is fancy legi-speak for “went nowhere”. I say “pretty sure” because Texas has some funky procedures regarding the Governor’s ability to call special sessions for certain issues, but I haven’t heard of one for this… yet. Not saying it couldn’t happen.

At any rate, I found this tidbit from the article amusing. Sometimes journalists like to rile their readers up, let ‘em know what sorts of outrageous consequences there could be if a bill doesn’t pass:

For some, the device is only a temporary inconvenience.

Being a condition of bond, the suspect could be allowed to have the device removed if the case is dismissed, or the terms of the conviction or probation don’t mandate its use.

That’s right folks! You get arrested, not convicted but just accused of DWI second in Texas, and you’re going to be required to put an interlock on your car. But as the law stands now… if the state dismisses your case (or, and the article doesn’t mention this, but hey, this is bad law too) if you are acquitted…

Under current law, you are no longer required to have the IID on your car. Imagine that. The horror. Better call your legislator and, well, tell them what? Rewind time and get this bill out of committee?

 

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://dwi.austindefense.com/admin/trackback/147370
Comments (7)Subscribe to Comments on this Entry Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
attevyJag - October 9, 2009 12:11 AM

Как говорится, Nemo omnia potest scire

sergio delcampo - January 10, 2010 3:27 PM

I got arrested for dwi 3 days ago I got my 1st one dismissed. Can I get this one dismissed as well?

Colorado DUI Lawyer - January 28, 2010 10:41 AM

Colorado now requires interlocks on first offenses.

Buck - February 3, 2010 5:44 PM

Funny attitude of the North TExas press - presumption of "guilty till proved innocent" or thereafter. Sounds like my wife's attitude about adultery - It doesnt matter that I DIDN'T do it, hell, she's mad because I thought about it, or COULDA done it! lol

Kyle - September 18, 2010 3:19 AM

This is all just another way for the horrible state of texas to get more money out of the residents way to go Texas If only u were this good at taking care of the residents as you are screwing them over it'd b a much better state

Texas DWI - December 9, 2010 3:45 AM

These interlock devices in the vehicles will help vehicles and drivers to get a safety measure whenever found guilty in cases of DUI or DWI.

Georgia Drivers Ed - December 2, 2011 2:34 AM

I would recommend to use the Ignition Interlocks for only serious or regular offenders.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.