Comments on The Implied Consent Fallacy in Texas DWI Cases | Austin DWI Lawyer http://dwi.austindefense.com/2007/02/articles/license-suspension-alr-hearing/the-implied-consent-fallacy-in-texas-dwi-cases/ en-us Copyright 2010 Sun, 26 Jul 2009 03:27:53 -0600 Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:39:26 -0600 http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss sportyks@juno.coom (K Schleicher) Could this be a rebuttable presumtion? Or "deemation"?

]]> http://dwi.austindefense.com/2007/02/articles/license-suspension-alr-hearing/the-implied-consent-fallacy-in-texas-dwi-cases/#2170617 http://dwi.austindefense.com/2007/02/articles/license-suspension-alr-hearing/the-implied-consent-fallacy-in-texas-dwi-cases/#2170617 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:56:39 -0600 kimi_3240207@yahoo.com (Kimberly) Dear Mr. Spencer:
I have a friend that was convicted of three DWI offenses in Texas and received a sentence 25 years in prison. Dont you think that a little extreme for a circumstance that did not cause any deaths, no bodily injuries and involved no children.Can anyone help me find some case law to help him.

]]> http://dwi.austindefense.com/2007/02/articles/license-suspension-alr-hearing/the-implied-consent-fallacy-in-texas-dwi-cases/#2468549 http://dwi.austindefense.com/2007/02/articles/license-suspension-alr-hearing/the-implied-consent-fallacy-in-texas-dwi-cases/#2468549 Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:18:10 -0600 jwiederstein1@satx.rr.com (Jason) It's a good law. Bottom line, don't drive after consuming alcohol.

Simple enough, why don't they get it? Too bad there are attorney's who defend these people of lower than average intelligence.

]]> http://dwi.austindefense.com/2007/02/articles/license-suspension-alr-hearing/the-implied-consent-fallacy-in-texas-dwi-cases/#2748599 http://dwi.austindefense.com/2007/02/articles/license-suspension-alr-hearing/the-implied-consent-fallacy-in-texas-dwi-cases/#2748599 Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:34:27 -0600 cmeasterly@austin.rr.com (Michelle) After reviewing the "APPLICATION FOR TEXAS DRIVER LICENSE OR IDENTIFICATION CARD" I found that the only persons required to sign that they received the "implied consent law" documentation are those under the age of 18 and their cosigners. This is made evident on page 2 of the application under the Notary section. I believe it’s reasonable to conclude that, any persons issued a TX DL at or after the age of 18 never gave receipt for such a document.

]]> http://dwi.austindefense.com/2007/02/articles/license-suspension-alr-hearing/the-implied-consent-fallacy-in-texas-dwi-cases/#4109850 http://dwi.austindefense.com/2007/02/articles/license-suspension-alr-hearing/the-implied-consent-fallacy-in-texas-dwi-cases/#4109850 Sun, 26 Jul 2009 03:26:00 -0600 cmeasterly@austin.rr.com (Michelle) After reviewing the "APPLICATION FOR TEXAS DRIVER LICENSE OR IDENTIFICATION CARD" I found that the only persons required to sign that they received the "implied consent law" documentation are those under the age of 18 and their cosigners. This is made evident on page 2 of the application under the Notary section. I believe it's reasonable to conclude that, any persons issued a TX DL at or after the age of 18 never gave receipt for such a document.

]]> http://dwi.austindefense.com/2007/02/articles/license-suspension-alr-hearing/the-implied-consent-fallacy-in-texas-dwi-cases/#4109879 http://dwi.austindefense.com/2007/02/articles/license-suspension-alr-hearing/the-implied-consent-fallacy-in-texas-dwi-cases/#4109879 Sun, 26 Jul 2009 03:27:53 -0600